Discussion Board; Expenses Related to Response, Continuity and Recovery to an Incident
Discussion board
1. Discuss the need to monitor expenses related to the response, continuity and recovery to an incident. How is this need best accomplished? How would it be different under the Incident Command System?
2. Although the standards mandate very specific requirements for the plans that add a level of complexity, discuss the pros and cons of very simple plans versus detailed plans?
3. How do exercises and tests support continual improvement?
4. Discuss experiences a group would have observed when change is introduced into an organization. How can any roadblocks resolved?
Please send different files for each question. Each is one page so total of 4 different papers
answer preview
Discussion Board; Expenses Related to Response, Continuity and Recovery to an Incident
Due to various reservations in the business environment, many organizations and business firms have been made to critically re-examine the sustainability and effectiveness of their current business continuity plans as well as disaster management plans (Smith, 2005). For instance, the 2001 terror attack in the United States brought a lot of lessons to organizations for the need to be well prepared in order to continue working even in the most difficult situations (Lam, 2002). It is important for organizations to have a well-structured plan that provides guidance on what to do and how to operate even in terms of uncertainties, pressure or disasters. This paper provides an in-depth analysis on the need to monitor expendituresconnected to response, continuity as well as recovery following any given incidence. It further examines the advantages as well as the shortcomings of simple versus complex or detailed plans…………………….words 1333